Church takes out restraining order against family in Minnesota
Carol Race, a mom in Minnesota, was to go to court today over a restraining order taken out against her son, 13 year old Adam.
Adam is autistic.
St. Joseph’s in Bertha, Minn., took out the restraining order because it considers Adam a threat and a disruption. Church leaders say that the order, which bans Adam and his family from attending mass, was a last resort
Adam, who is more than six feet tall and weight 225 pounds, has loud outbursts and can become violent. Church leaders decry “repeated disruptions in church,” over the last three years.
According to the petition filed by Father Daniel Walz, Adam “spits,” and has “urinated” in church. He has also “struck a child” during mass. “It takes up to three adults to restrain him,” the petition says. “Adam’s continued presence on parish grounds not only endangers the parishioners, it is disruptive to the devout celebrations of the Eucharist.”
Adam’s parents have had to sit on him to restrain him during the service, and have, on occasion, resorted to tying his arms and feet with ropes. He has become sexually aggressive with a teenage girl. He has come close to knocking elderly parishioners down, and on at least one occasion, ran from his parents and started their van… which could have led to many being seriously injured, or worse.
St. Joseph’s claims to have tried to work with the family. They have suggested attending a different mass, or setting aside a seating area for the family. All suggestions were apparently refused.
As this past Sunday dawned, the Race family was in a quandary. As Catholics, they believe in the obligation to attend mass. Carol Race planned to attend church as usual, at St. Joseph’s. But as she left her house, Todd County Sheriff Pete Mikkelson warned her that she would be arrested if she attended.
So the family attended a different church, Christ the King in Browerville, Minn., but would like to return to St. Joseph’s, which has been her family’s church for the past 12 years.
OK, there’s the story. What do you think?
My first thought was of the Pharisees, who’s view of the religious world was so legalistic that it was counter to Christ’s words. In Matthew 25, Christ speaks about the final judgement, when all shall stand before God.
34) “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35) For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36)I needed clothes and you clothes me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
37) “then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38) When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39) When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’
40) “The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.”
Matthew 25: 34-40 (New International Version)
I also have a first hand experience attending a church where severely autistic parishioners were present. My husband and I were in Rochester, N.Y., nearly a decade ago, and attended a Catholic church in the downtown area called Corpus Christi. I was amazed at what I saw. This vibrant church accepted all… and I do mean all. There was an entire section filled with the severely handicapped and those who attended with them. Yes, the section was noisy with grunts and occasional outbursts. Many of them wore football-type helmets, to keep them from hurting themselves.
This was the only time I attended Corpus Christi (which, by the way, means “body of Christ), but the memory has stayed with me. I hope that the outreach has remained the same.
That said, the family must be willing to work with the church. While I don’t believe that anyone should be denied access, I do believe that those involved must work to come up with a solution that is viable for all, not just for a few.
The Race family has a right to attend mass… but the parishioners of St. Joseph’s have an equal right to be protected when they attend Mass.
I hope that the parties truly will work together, and not have their feet set in concrete. Both the Race family and the Church have allowed this matter to escalate until it is now a national story, picked up by the networks. A story that should have never happened has been reduced to soundbites, with people who have no intimate knowledge of the situation (like me) weighing in and taking sides.
Until Christians learn to work together, to compromise for the greater good, we will continue to read about such situations that are thrust before our courts.
See also: Jesus Wept

May 20th, 2008 at 5:47 pm
i agree with you the family should be willing to work with the chruch and i can understand them asking the family not to come some autistic adults are very violent and they can’t control it at the same time the chruch should be praying for healing for the boy too it’s a tough call but you have to compromise
May 20th, 2008 at 10:47 pm
Why can ‘t they pray with the kid at home.The catholic teaching that Mass is essential for salvation is not Bible based.
The idea of having a separate area for handicapped people who might disturb the rest of the congregation is a good solution.
I feel bad for the Race family, but the rest of the church congregation also needs to be “protected” from him.
May 28th, 2008 at 12:28 am
If the child is a threat to other parishioners, the church has every right to demand that the family not bring the child to church property. Yes, the child is autistic, and I’m sure that the parents’ lives are extremely difficult, and they could use mass all the more for it. However, what about the teenage girl the child was sexually aggressive with? She shouldn’t have to be afraid of being harassed at mass by anyone, even someone who is not mentally all there.
Maybe the parents should look into a facility that is equipped to handle mentally disabled parishioners. There are masses at nursing homes and hospitals that have doctors, nurses, and caretakers on hand.
The situation is sad, but unless the parents can get their child under control (which is easier said than done with autism), they should not bring him to a place that cannot handle his behavior.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:43 am
We have two autistic teenage boys who attend daily mass at our parish, including the school mass on Friday mornings. They frequently grunt and shout out, which we have all become accustomed to. However, I think that the situation with this boy is extreme. I feel bad for the parents, but they really could have considered other options, like attending mass separately so that they could take turns staying at home with their son. I think sometimes people forget that having compassion for this family and protecting the parishioners are not mutually exclusive. Both sides just have to be willing to understand each other. Unfortunately, it sounds like the parents are in denial about the actual danger their son presents to others. Hopefully, this will change so that they can find ways to handle their situation in a manner that is not only good for their son, but protects those around him.
June 2nd, 2008 at 1:54 am
[...] Minnesota who’s church took out a restraining order to keep him from attending services there (Church takes out restraining order against family in Minnesota). You may remember that The Church of St. Joseph argues that Adam, who stands over six feet tall and [...]